lab rats
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...AP–The federal government today released the findings of a four year study that linked living in cages to increased potential of developing cancer in laboratory rats.
The study, which cost an estimated $17 million, was started in 1983 when all the rats in a laboratory test control group contracted cancer.
Spokesperson John Smith explained: “We were running a test on the possible link between excess popcorn intake and increased incidence of colon cancer. The test group consisted of twenty rats who were forcefed three quarts (roughly one and a half times their body weight) of popcorn daily, a perfectly reasonable amount under laboratory conditions. The control group consisted of twenty rats who lived in cages carefully shielded from all known carcinogens. To our surprise, all twenty control rats developed cancer within six months.”
Smith went on to say: “We had always had some trouble with control rats contracting cancer. But as long as more of the rats in the test group than the control group got cancer, we were able to feel pretty good about condemning whatever we were testing at the time.”
Smith was then questioned about the possibility of test results being invalid if any of the control rats developed cancer. He responded: “Yeah, we had an scientist at the lab ask that once. We had to let him go when we found out he was a member of the Audubon Society. Conflict of interest. The last thing you want in a research lab is someone asking a lot of fool questions.”
When asked if these results would change any previous findings Smith replied “This could blow our whole gig. I mean, if it’s been the cages all along, this could mean that things like asbestos, smoking, even radiation are perfectly harmless.”
“We may be forced to recall all our previous findings at a cost of billions of dollars. This says nothing of the possible lawsuits from individuals who contracted cancer while spending time in prison, or zoo workers forced to spend extended periods inside the animal’s cages.”
When asked why the study cost seventeen million dollars, Smith responded “Do you have any idea how expensive it is to provide food and living conditions for rats that doesn’t expose them to any of the things we have determined to cause cancer? In fact right now we’re in the middle of a two year study that may link breathing with lung cancer. You think the cost is bad now, just wait till we are forced to prevent the control rats From breathing so as not to invalidate the results by having more of the control rats get cancer than test rats.”
